哈佛商业评论佛的指导方针r Contributors

AtHarvard Business Review, we believe in management. If the world’s organizations and institutions were run more effectively, if our leaders made better decisions, if people worked more productively, we believe that all of us — employees, bosses, customers, our families, and the people our businesses affect — would be better off. So we try to arm our readers with ideas that help them become smarter, more creative, and more courageous in their work. To do that, we enlist the foremost experts in management theory and practice, collaborating to express their thoughts in the most influential way possible.

HBR涵盖广泛的主题,包括战略,领导,组织变革,谈判,运营,创新,决策,营销,金融,工作 - 生活平衡和管理团队。我们发布了许多长度的文章(一些印刷和数字形式,其中一些),图形,播客,视频,幻灯片演示文稿,以及任何其他可能有助于我们有效分享一个想法的媒体。yabo88足彩

Here are the five qualities we look for when evaluating what to publish:

1. Expertise: You don’t have to be well known to be a contributor, but you must know a lot about the subject you’re writing about.

2. Evidence: It’s not enough to know your subject deeply — you have to prove it to the reader. Referring to supporting research is one good way to do this; describing relevant examples is another. If you have interesting data, let us know.

3. Originality: New ideas in management are rare and precious — and one of the primary reasons readers turn to HBR. If you’re writing about a well-worn topic, we’ll be looking for a unique argument or insight.

有用如果您可以解释您的思维,以便读者了解如何在真实情况下应用它,这将使它更强大。

5. Writing that’s persuasive and a pleasure to read: HBR readers are smart and skeptical and busy. If you don’t capture their interest right away, they will move on to something else.

关于过程的一般票据

We receive many more submissions than we can publish, and we often have to say no to good proposals due to limitations of space and time or because they’re not distinct enough from other pieces we have published. If we’ve passed on something you’ve submitted, please feel free to try again with another idea. If our editors have said no multiple times, it may mean your work isn’t a good fit for our audience.

我们的编辑过程比许多其他出版商更彻底,您可能会要求您做多轮修订。贡献者经常告诉我们,他们欣赏他们的工作收到的额外关注和关注。

We retain final decision rights over headlines. Our editors have spent years learning which kinds of headlines give HBR pieces the best chance of being read, found online, and shared both on social media and in offices around the world. If we rewrite your title, it’s because we believe the revised version will help your idea reach the audience it deserves.

We strive for authenticity in our articles. We don’t publish pieces that have appeared elsewhere, that come across as promotional, or that do not include rigorous citations (though these may not appear in the finished piece). We ask our authors to disclose any financial relationships they have with companies cited in the proposed article. HBR typically holds copyright on the finished product, but authors continue to own the underlying ideas in their articles.

在我们确定在哪里以及如何发布它们之前,我们尝试评估想法。我们将考虑仅包含短距离的提交,我们可以帮助确定该想法是否应该成为杂志功能,数字文章,亚博在线娱乐官网
podcast, graphic, video, or another format. That said, there are some differences between the submission processes for HBR.org and the magazine.

Process notes for HBR.org

All submissions to the web are made on spec. It’s helpful if you send us a short pitch first so that we can give you early feedback, but we need to see a full draft before officially accepting a piece — even if we’ve asked you to write it, and even if you’ve written for us before. (If you don’t have a relationship with an HBR editor, you can send your pitch throughSubmittable。)

Process notes for the magazine

The evaluation process for long-form features in the magazine is more formal. It’s fine to send a pitch for a magazine feature to an editor, but if the idea is promising, eventually you’ll be asked to submit a formal proposal and narrative outline. The proposal should answer the following questions, though it doesn’t need to be in a Q&A format.

  1. 您建议写的文章的中央信息是什么?
  2. 关于你的想法的重要,有用,新的或违反直觉是什么?
  3. 为什么经理需要了解它?您今天如何应用您的想法?
  4. 您当局的来​​源是什么?在以前的工作(你自己或其他人')是这个想法建立的?
  5. 你会如何吸引哪个学术,专业或个人经历?

The narrative outline should be no more than 800 words and should lay out the structure of the proposed article. We want to understand how the logic of your argument will flow. Please illustrate your points with real-world examples or provide one extended, detailed example. (If you don’t have a relationship with an HBR editor, you can send your pitch throughSubmittable。)

Thanks for considering working with us.

Maureen Hoch
Editor, HBR.org

Amy Bernstein
Editor,Harvard Business Review